Publications & technical resources

Explore how DHO technology is facilitating scientific discovery

Showing
publications
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Education
Materials science
Image refocusing
Darkfield
Brightfield
Polarization imaging
Simultaneous multicolor
FISH & smFISH
Custom order
Tetrapod
Deep focus
Single helix
Double helix
Super resolution
Multiplexed imaging
High-throughput screening
High-content analysis
Inspection
Data visualization
Data analysis
Image reconstruction
Emitter localization
OEM integrations
Offline inspection
Online inspection
Spatial omics
Volumetric imaging
Nuclear biology
Drug discovery
Bacterial biology
FRET & smFRET
HILO
TIRF
Widefield
PAINT
PALM
STORM
Computer vision
Multicolor
Light sheet
Optical engineering
Immunotherapy
Chemical engineering
CLEM
Biophysics
3D particle tracking
Physical chemistry
Neuroscience
Proteomics
SPINDLE
Phase mask
Cell biology
Variable-angle illumination
3DTRAX
3D SMLM
Drug delivery
Two photon microscopy
Genomics
Environmental remediation
AI & ML
Mar 20, 2013
|
Journal of Biomedical Optics
Sreya Ghosh, Chrysanthe Preza
We characterize the three-dimensional (3-D) double-helix (DH) point-spread function (PSF) for depth-variant fluorescence microscopy imaging motivated by our interest to integrate the DH-PSF in computational optical sectioning microscopy (COSM) imaging. Physical parameters, such as refractive index and thickness variability of imaging layers encountered in 3-D microscopy give rise to depth-induced spherical aberration (SA) that change the shape of the PSF at different focusing depths and render computational approaches less practical. Theoretical and experimental studies performed to characterize the DH-PSF under varying imaging conditions are presented. Results show reasonable agreement between theoretical and experimental DH-PSFs suggesting that our model can predict the main features of the data. The depth-variability of the DH-PSF due to SA, quantified using a normalized mean square error, shows that the DH-PSF is more robust to SA than the conventional PSF. This result is also supported by the frequency analysis of the DH-PSF shown. Our studies suggest that further investigation of the DH-PSF's use in COSM is warranted, and that particle localization accuracy using the DH-PSF calibration curve in the presence of SA can be improved by accounting for the axial shift due to SA.
View publication
Feb 22, 2013
|
Proceedings of SPIE
Mikael P. Backlund, Matthew D. Lew, Adam S. Backer, Steffen J. Sahl, Ginni Grover, Anurag Agrawal, Rafael Piestun, W. E. Moerner
Single-molecule-based super-resolution fluorescence microscopy has recently been developed to surpass the diffraction limit by roughly an order of magnitude. These methods depend on the ability to precisely and accurately measure the position of a single-molecule emitter, typically by fitting its emission pattern to a symmetric estimator (e.g. centroid or 2D Gaussian). However, single-molecule emission patterns are not isotropic, and depend highly on the orientation of the molecule’s transition dipole moment, as well as its z-position. Failure to account for this fact can result in localization errors on the order of tens of nm for in-focus images, and ~50–200 nm for molecules at modest defocus. The latter range becomes especially important for three-dimensional (3D) single-molecule super-resolution techniques, which typically employ depths-of-field of up to ~2 μm. To address this issue we report the simultaneous measurement of precise and accurate 3D single-molecule position and 3D dipole orientation using the Double-Helix Point Spread Function (DH-PSF) microscope. We are thus able to significantly improve dipole-induced position errors, reducing standard deviations in lateral localization from ~2x worse than photon-limited precision (48 nm vs. 25 nm) to within 5 nm of photon-limited precision. Furthermore, by averaging many estimations of orientation we are able to improve from a lateral standard deviation of 116 nm (~4x worse than the precision, 28 nm) to 34 nm (within 6 nm).
View publication
Nov 20, 2012
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Mikael P. Backlund, Matthew D. Lew, Adam S. Backer, Steffen J. Sahl, Ginni Grover, Anurag Agrawal, Rafael Piestun, and W. E. Moerner
Recently, single molecule-based superresolution fluorescence microscopy has surpassed the diffraction limit to improve resolution to the order of 20 nm or better. These methods typically use image fitting that assumes an isotropic emission pattern from the single emitters as well as control of the emitter concentration. However, anisotropic single-molecule emission patterns arise from the transition dipole when it is rotationally immobile, depending highly on the molecule’s 3D orientation and z position. Failure to account for this fact can lead to significant lateral (x, y) mislocalizations (up to ∼50-200 nm). This systematic error can cause distortions in the reconstructed images, which can translate into degraded resolution. Using parameters uniquely inherent in the double-lobed nature of the Double-Helix Point Spread Function, we account for such mislocalizations and simultaneously measure 3D molecular orientation and 3D position. Mislocalizations during an axial scan of a single molecule manifest themselves as an apparent lateral shift in its position, which causes the standard deviation (SD) of its lateral position to appear larger than the SD expected from photon shot noise. By correcting each localization based on an estimated orientation, we are able to improve SDs in lateral localization from ∼2x worse than photon-limited precision (48 vs. 25 nm) to within 5 nm of photon-limited precision. Furthermore, by averaging many estimations of orientation over different depths, we are able to improve from a lateral SD of 116 (∼4× worse than the photon-limited precision; 28 nm) to 34 nm (within 6 nm of the photon limit).
View publication

No results found

Please try different keywords

Showing
webinars
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

No results found

Please try different keywords

Showing
notes
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

No results found

Please try different keywords

Ready to learn more?